Best NotetakerBest Notetaker
Take the quiz

Review · 2026

Trint AI notetaker logo

Trint review

Final score: 37/100 · Grade F · Not recommended

UK transcription platform built for journalists and media.

Veteran transcription editor with strong collaboration, redaction, and 30+ language support. Trusted in newsrooms and research orgs. Not a live meeting notetaker — pure post-production transcription.

Scorecard — 14 categories

#CategoryScoreWeightPts
1Recording & Platform Coverage37/5012%8.9
2Transcription Quality36/4510%8.0
3AI Reports & Notes21/4510%4.7
4Knowledge Management22/3010%7.3
5Email Handling13/308%3.5
6Telephony & VoIP12/258%3.8
7Integration — CRM8/257%2.2
8Integration — ATS2/205%0.5
9Integration — Productivity10/205%2.5
10Automation & Workflows22/3510%6.3
11Organization & Search24/305%4.0
12Conversation Intelligence15/305%2.5
13Security & Compliance33/408%6.6
14Pricing & Value16/257%4.5
Final scoreF100%37/100

Top strengths

  • Security & Compliance (83%)
  • Transcription Quality (80%)
  • Organization & Search (80%)

Weakest areas

  • Integration — ATS (10%)
  • Integration — CRM (32%)
  • Email Handling (43%)
Should you pick Trint? Run the quiz to see how Trint ranks against your specific constraints — team size, language, integrations, budget.